Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Circulation ; 147(11): 897-913, 2023 03 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2261224

ABSTRACT

Therapeutic anticoagulation is indicated for a variety of circumstances and conditions in several fields of medicine to prevent or treat venous and arterial thromboembolism. According to the different mechanisms of action, the available parenteral and oral anticoagulant drugs share the common principle of hampering or blocking key steps of the coagulation cascade, which unavoidably comes at the price of an increased propensity to bleed. Hemorrhagic complications affect patient prognosis both directly and indirectly (ie, by preventing the adoption of an effective antithrombotic strategy). Inhibition of factor XI (FXI) has emerged as a strategy with the potential to uncouple the pharmacological effect and the adverse events of anticoagulant therapy. This observation is based on the differential contribution of FXI to thrombus amplification, in which it plays a major role, and hemostasis, in which it plays an ancillary role in final clot consolidation. Several agents were developed to inhibit FXI at different stages (ie, suppressing biosynthesis, preventing zymogen activation, or impeding the biological action of the active form), including antisense oligonucleotides, monoclonal antibodies, small synthetic molecules, natural peptides, and aptamers. Phase 2 studies of different classes of FXI inhibitors in orthopedic surgery suggested that dose-dependent reductions in thrombotic complications are not paralleled by dose-dependent increases in bleeding compared with low-molecular-weight heparin. Likewise, the FXI inhibitor asundexian was associated with lower rates of bleeding compared with the activated factor X inhibitor apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation, although no evidence of a therapeutic effect on stroke prevention is available so far. FXI inhibition could also be appealing for patients with other conditions, including end-stage renal disease, noncardioembolic stroke, or acute myocardial infarction, for which other phase 2 studies have been conducted. The balance between thromboprophylaxis and bleeding achieved by FXI inhibitors needs confirmation in large-scale phase 3 clinical trials powered for clinical end points. Several of such trials are ongoing or planned to define the role of FXI inhibitors in clinical practice and to clarify which FXI inhibitor may be most suited for each clinical indication. This article reviews the rationale, pharmacology, results of medium or small phase 2 studies, and future perspectives of drugs inhibiting FXI.


Subject(s)
Stroke , Thrombosis , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Factor XI , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Blood Coagulation , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Hemorrhage/etiology , Stroke/drug therapy
2.
Thromb Res ; 214: 53-62, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1852144

ABSTRACT

In this review, we give an overview over observational and experimental studies supporting factors XI and XII as targets for anticoagulant therapy. The majority of observational studies on FXI report low concentrations of FXI to be protective against ischemic stroke and venous thrombosis. There is also extensive evidence from experimental and animal studies supporting FXI inhibition as a target for anticoagulant therapy, alone or in combination with other antithrombotic treatments. Four Phase 2 clinical trials on patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty showed non-inferiority or superiority of FXI inhibition compared to enoxaparin for the primary outcome, which was incidence of venous thromboembolism. One Phase 2 trial reported that FXI inhibition is associated with fewer bleeding events than apixaban. The results from observational studies on FXII are more conflicting. Some show that low FXII concentrations confer protection against thrombosis, while others have found it to be deleterious. Results from experimental studies are inconclusive, but suggest that FXII inhibition might be useful in preventing thrombosis caused by foreign objects like catheters or mechanical heart valves. One Phase 2 study not conducted on thrombosis has reported FXII inhibition as safe. In conclusion, FXI seems to be a promising target for antithrombotic therapy, both alone and in combination with existing therapies, while the potential of targeting FXII is still unclear.


Subject(s)
Factor XII , Thrombosis , Animals , Anticoagulants/pharmacology , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Blood Coagulation , Factor XI , Humans , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Thrombosis/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL